Monday 18 August 2014

A Chess Board for the World’s Puppet Masters

The great Sally from Saar writes:

The Sykes-Picot Agreement of May 1916 was a secret agreement that was concluded by two British and French diplomats, Sir Mark Sykes and Georges Picot.

This Agreement involved itself with the partition of the Ottoman Empire once World War One had ended. The Sykes-Picot Agreement effectively handed over control of Syria, Lebanon and Turkish Cilicia to the French and Palestine, Jordan and areas around the Arabian Gulf and Baghdad to the British.

While neither France nor Britain actually ‘owned’ these territories, they were to effectively control them at a governmental and administrative level.

Northern Syria and Mesopotamia were also considered to be an area of French influence while Arabia and the Jordan Valley were considered to be a sphere of influence of the British. Jerusalem was to be governed by an international administration.

The Russian Tsarist government was a minor party to the Sykes-Picot agreement, and when, following the Russian Revolution of October 1917, the Bolsheviks exposed the agreement, “the British were embarrassed, the Arabs dismayed and the Turks delighted.” (History learning)

After the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, London and Paris denied freedom to the Arabs, while sowing the seeds of discord amongst the Arab people. Corrupt locals were covertly recruited to become clients of Britain and France. In the same sense, the “Arab Spring” is being manipulated today.

The US, Britain, France and others continue their work with the help of local corrupt individuals and figures on their march to restructure the Arab World. Hence, locals like Alkhawajas, Shehabi, Ali Salman, Mushiama, Nabeel Rajab, Isa Qassim and Mattar Mattar amongst others, have been recruited to mobilize terrorists under the dark shroud of “human rights activists”.

These terrorist leaders are astonishingly even given a voice inside the UN, House of Commons, Congress and their false allegations given airtime on western media channels.

International media conveniently ignores that all the major conflicts in the Middle East and Africa are consequences of overlapping Anglo-America-Israel agendas. Could it be that international media house owners are part of this scandalous plan?

After all, it is claimed that out of 88, only 6 media houses exist today. These 6 all get their news from Reuters and the Associated Press. Reuters owns the AP and the Zionist trillionaire family Rothschilds owns Reuters.

It is no wonder that all the media information about Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Bahrain and KSA has been completely distorted from the outset.

In June 2006, Condoleezza Rice introduced the world to the “New Middle East” – a term that replaced the more domineering term “The Greater Middle East”.

She mentioned during this press conference another phrase “creative chaos” which at the time was not understood.

Since then, there is evidence that the CIA had gone into countries to move among the few dissatisfied (as if there are no unhappy citizens in Washington and London) and stimulate a revolt; thus creating an ideal situation for warfare throughout the region and giving US, Britain and Israel and opportunity to redraw the Middle East.

Lieutenant Colonel Ralph Peters prepared the New Middle East map, released to the public on July 2001, published in the Armed Forces Journal in June 2006 and used at NATO Defence college for senior military officers training and the National War Academy as well as in high profile military planning circles.

In 2007, General Wesley Clark revealed that he was told immediately after 9/11 of a “coup” being plotted by Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfield, Paul Wolfowitz and what he called “a half dozen other collaborators from the Project for the New American Century” that included an invasion of Iraq.

Six weeks later, he saw the same officer and asked, “Why haven’t we attacked Iraq? Are we still going to attack Iraq?” He said: “Sir, it’s worse than that.”

The officer pulled out a piece of paper and said “I just got the memo from the Secretary of Defence’s office. It says we’re going to attack and destroy the governments in seven countries in five years – we’re going to start with Iraq, and then we’re going to Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran”. Clark said “they wanted us to destablize the Middle East, turn it upside down and make it under out control”.

All part of the plan!

The “Arab Spring” referred to the events in 2011 and since then has been replaced with “Arab Awakening” – terms created by people sitting in Washington, London and Brussels – people who know very little, if anything, about the Arab world.

However, the term “awakening” suggests that the Arabs are completely unaware of the heinous agenda, but were Saddam, Gaddafi, Sadat and King Faisal not murdered because they were awake?

It would also appear that Bahrain and KSA are the new targets because the leaderships are very much awake.

The Bahrain Prime Minister has continued to urge Arab unity and always encouraged constructive criticism, freedom of speech and an open dialogue through continued achievements.

The Premier has reiterated the importance of security and refused to get dragged into any foreign agenda that will affect the country and the people he works and lives for.

Based on his comments and carefully chosen words, the Premier appears to be well aware of the external agenda, the recruitment of locals and role of foreign powers. Prince Khalifa recently said, “The citizen is the only support to the government of progress and development”.

Western media choose to overlook the obvious fact that the Premier has the full support of the majority and is very much awake.

Meanwhile, the devastation of the Arabian Peninsula for the New Middle East continues.

The Yinon Plan was named after the Israeli foreign minister. His Zionist plan was based on the divide and rule plan for the MENA – to decapitate and dissolve surrounding Arab states into sub-nations warring between them.

The plan outlined Iraq as the centerpiece for the fragmentation of the Middle East and the Arab World. The plan was the division of Lebanon Egypt, Syria, Turkey, Somalia and Pakistan and the dissolution of North Africa.

The vision was to begin with Egypt and then spill over into Sudan, Libya and the rest of the region.

In 2011, there was an attempt to forge a divide in Egypt; initially, it was successful, as masses were mobilised under the “Arab Spring”, leading to the formation of a sectarian dominated Egypt under the mercy of the Muslim Brotherhood. However, with the rising of the Egyptian people and the removal of Morsi, the plan was revisited.

The Yinon Plan is a continuation of the British strategy and needed fine tuning under the changing circumstances.

A new plan supported by US policy maker Richard Perle with a study group prepared the “Clean Break: A New Strategy for securing the Realm”.

It was a policy written in 1996 by the Study Group on “A new Israeli Strategy Toward 2000” for Benjamin Netanyahu.

Perle was the former Pentagon under-secretary for Ronald Reagan at the time and later, US military advisor to George Bush and the White House.

Academics have questioned if, in this context, the word “realm” suggests that Tel Aviv believes the Middle East to be its Kingdom.

Let’s be clear: the first step of the “New Middle East” called for the removal of President Saddam Hussein!

The objectives of the Yinon Plan is to divide the Arab states, starting with Lebanon and Syria on the basis of religion and sectarian identities for Sunni Muslims, Shia Muslims, Christians and Druze.

It was reported that Sarkozy informed Sheikh Al Rahi that Christian communities of the Levant and Middle East can resettle in the EU.

The fragmentation of African countries is also part of their agenda – let’s not forget that the Advanced Strategic and Political Studies (ASPS), which is the Israeli think-tank, included Perle, pushed for creating the Pentagon’s US, Africa Command (AFRICOM).

They are currently fuelling divisions based on colour, religion, ethnicity and language, with the intention to cause disunity in Africa.

Multi-culturalism is a threat to Washington and its allies and that is why Sarkozy, Merkel and Cameron made declarations at the start of the Libya conflict that “multiculturalism is dead” in their respective countries.

In 2011, Bahrain resisted falling victim to this plan, but the challenges are far from over. Sectarian divide continues to be encouraged by AlWefaq and endorsed by Western powers that ‘sympathize’ with their sectarian goal. Bahrain has lived in religious and multi-ethnic harmony for decades – this level of unity created by the Al Khalifa leadership challenges the Yinon plan.
The majority in this country support the leadership and since this has become evident, the only way forward for Washington, London and Paris is to offer unconditional support to AlWefaq to create a sectarian divide that has never existed in this country.

Enemies of the state will continue to fail if Bahraini politicians remain alert and appreciate that their so-called “allies” are part of the plan to divide and rule and merely plan to use Bahrain as a stepping-stone into the KSA and beyond.
For skeptics – ask yourselves:

  • Why is AlWefaq, a minority, yet, their tainted voice is the only voice heard in the international arena?
  • Why is the leadership that has offered the people in this country democracy, religious freedom, gender equality, free housing, health and education being unnecessarily criticized?
  • Why are the voices of the majority in Bahrain who support the current government silenced in Western media?
  • AlWefaq has proved to have terrorist links so why do Washington and London continue to entertain them and their supporters?
  • Nabeel Rajab has proved to have terrorist links and to Ahmed Chalabi (linked to the Clean Break document) so why is he entertained by Western media, Washington and London?
It is absolutely essential for the Yinon Plan and the Clean Break Document that there is sectarian divide. The elections are looming and the only goal of AlWefaq is to cause sectarian divide.

The West is guilty of colonizing, fragmenting and denying democracy to the colonized by instilling the idea that people from far away lands needed to be “civilized” by the “white man”.

The main ideology has not changed for US, Britain, France and Germany – they have just adapted to causing “creative chaos” and going to war under the umbrellas of women’s rights, human rights, humanitarian and the democracy they denied to the colonized.

It is the duty of every Arab to let them know that the Arabs intend to stay awake and unified.

No comments:

Post a Comment