Wednesday 14 September 2011

Intelligence Review

John writes:

Last week I had an encounter with some members of the Lyndon LaRouche movement. I was going to the local post office to drop off some mail and was surprised to find two LaRouche movement members camped outside with some literature and their now-infamous "Obama Hitler" sign. I could tell that the post office patrons were not too happy about the situation, but being a curious (or foolish) fellow, I walked over and started talking with one of the LaRouchies, a woman, probably in her 50s or early 60s.

The conversation was rather one-sided. I heard some of the usual LaRouche conspiracy theories about the "British Empire" and whatnot. However, when it came to topics such as labor rights and austerity, I found myself agreeing with the LaRouchies, or at least with this particular LaRouche movement member. The woman made the point that a society that squeezes fire and police department budgets but lavishes money on banks to make up for their speculative losses is a dysfunctional one. While I found some common ground on some topics, I just couldn't get past the conspiracy theories and the lionization of the bizarre Lyndon LaRouche. I accepted some literature (which, to be honest, I disposed of as soon as I got home) and politely made my exit.

At a time when so many people are dissatisfied with the political mainstream, it is not surprising that conspiracy theorists such as Lyndon LaRouche and Alex Jones receive so much attention. On the other hand, conspiracy theories often do not accurately depict reality and prevent people from engaging in systemic, institutional or philosophical analysis. At their worst, conspiracy theories can lead to the scapegoating of unpopular groups, as is the case with anti-Semitic conspiracy theories, for example.

That being said, I do not see the growth of "fringe" movements as a huge problem, despite fears that one of these relatively small groups will transform into a powerful fascist movement. More worrisome is the alienation of increasingly large numbers of people from public life. I see mass resignation as the most likely result of the transformation of politics into a wholly plutocratic affair. It seems that if democracy is on its way out, it will go out with a whimper, not a bang.

Six LaRouche supporters are to seek Democratic nominations in 2012. One of them, Kesha Rogers in TX22, was nominated in 2010.

The challenge to the Democratic Party is clear. It needs to become once again the party of those who would end the bailouts, restore Glass-Steagall, bring home the troops from Afghanistan and Iraq, eschew future such adventures, invest in key infrastructure (not least including nuclear power), uphold the traditional definition of marriage, really fight against drugs, introduce single-payer healthcare, resist climate change hysteria, and defend both classical education and working and middle-class access to it. The party that would indeed have impeached Dick Cheney, even if not quite for the reasons given by LaRouche. If the mainstream party will not do this, then it will be done by the LaRouche Movement. Which, considering that Rogers is in her early thirties, shows every sign of outliving the man himself.

But remember, if you believe in any conceivable connection between the Iranian Revolutionary Guard and the Shia-persecuting “Taliban”, then you are as stupid and as credulous as anyone who believes in “al-Qaeda”, or in “the global terrorist network”, or in “Taliban” distinct from the Pashtun as a whole, or in any connection between Afghanistan and 9/11, or in any connection between Iraq and 9/11, or in WMD in Iraq, or in such WMD as a threat to any Western country even if they had existed, or in an Iranian nuclear weapons programme, or in such a programme as a threat to any Western country even if it existed. In which case, you are on exactly the same level as birthers, or as truthers, or as those who liken Obama to Hitler, or as those who likened Bush to Hitler, and as the followers of Lyndon LaRouche. Are you?

2 comments:

  1. I have a family member who joined the Larouche movement a couple of years ago. Within 4 months of his contact with them, his political views changed drastically, rock music was Satanic, and Obama was a Hitler figurehead put in by the British Empire. He then moved far across the country, isolating himself from friends and family.

    Larouche is a convicted felon, arrested and jailed for fraud in the late 80s along with many of his followers (his followers will tell you it was all a setup). His "security advisor," Roy Frankhouser, was also jailed for obstruction of justice in Larouche's investigation. Frankhouser was a Grand Dragon of the Ku Klux Klan. Larouche appears on his website weekly to profess that the end of the world is coming NOW and he is the only one who can save us.

    My point is that, no matter what your political beliefs are, this group is in my view a destructive political hate cult that ruins families, engages in mind control to exploit its members, and intimidates critics much in the way of the Moonies and Scientology.

    Next time you run into them, I would encourage you to avoid a political discussion and ask the members how Larouche makes his money, how long they work for him every day, and if there is anything that Larouche says that they disagree with.

    http://freedomofmind.com/resourcecenter/groups/l/larouche/

    ReplyDelete
  2. If Britain is paying the American political elite, then we want our money back.

    ReplyDelete